Upcoming Events

National | Consumer Issues

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The New Normal Goon Squad Arrests Heroic... Mon May 10, 2021 11:53 | Andrea Widburg

offsite link Why MBS Suddenly Wants to Talk to Iran? Mon May 10, 2021 10:14 | Trita Parsi

offsite link Blessed Are the Covidians Sun May 09, 2021 19:51 | Thezman

offsite link Afghanistan: 800 Children Killed in Airs... Sun May 09, 2021 18:09 | Dave DeCamp

offsite link In the ‘Land of the Free’ Even the P... Sun May 09, 2021 15:51 | Jana Winter

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

Lockdown Sceptics

Stay Sceptical. Control the Hysteria. Save Lives.

offsite link A Note on the Election Result Mon May 10, 2021 02:33 | Toby Young
Incumbents got a boost at the local elections, but not because they handled the coronavirus crisis well. They got a boost because they've been faced with lacklustre opponents and a supine media.
The post A Note on the Election Result appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.

offsite link Keeping Social Distancing Beyond June Would Be ?Morally Wrong?, Says Steve Baker Sun May 09, 2021 22:36 | Michael Curzon
Conservative backbencher Steve Baker says that it would be morally wrong for anti-Covid measures such as social distancing to stay in place past June 21st.
The post Keeping Social Distancing Beyond June Would Be “Morally Wrong”, Says Steve Baker appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.

offsite link COVID-19: Just the Facts Sun May 09, 2021 19:54 | Toby Young
We're publishing an original piece today by Dr Will Jones, one of Lockdown Sceptics' editors, answering 12 key questions about COVID-19 as factually as possible, referencing the best, most up-to-date evidence. A must read.
The post COVID-19: Just the Facts appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.

offsite link Britons Catching Covid after Being Vaccinated Get Milder Symptoms Sun May 09, 2021 17:11 | Toby Young
According to the data gathered by the ZOE Covid Study app based at King's College London, Britons catching coronavirus post-vaccination get a milder form of the disease.
The post Britons Catching Covid after Being Vaccinated Get Milder Symptoms appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.

offsite link Two Covid Deaths Reported in Last 24 Hours Sun May 09, 2021 16:33 | Michael Curzon
The number of Covid deaths has fallen by 86% in a week and just two deaths have been reported in the last 24 hours.
The post Two Covid Deaths Reported in Last 24 Hours appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network

No Refund in Naas

category national | consumer issues | opinion/analysis author Tuesday November 15, 2005 19:58author by Anton Mace Report this post to the editors

Is this legal?

Today I bought a book and returned it but was refused a refund.
Blanked-out receipt.
Blanked-out receipt.

At 13:12:37 today i bought a book in a bookshop in Naas.

It was for an older person who is bedridden.

When I showed her the book she said it was the wrong one and instructed me to go and get a refund.

When i went back to the shop the manager told me she would not give me a refund.

I told her it was required by law that she do so but she said no.

Is she right?

copy of reciept below.

author by eddie hobbesianpublication date Tue Nov 15, 2005 20:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

You made the error, the good was neither faulty or whatever. So it was up to you to make the correct purchase. The owners of the shop is a scabby so and so all the same.

author by Margaretpublication date Tue Nov 15, 2005 21:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Just had a quick look at these websites
Government OASIS site:
http://www.oasis.gov.ie/consumer_affairs/?CONTACTSID=42a26b5f509dd09347be896791093696

and the Office of the Director of Consumer Affairs:
http://www.odca.ie/

Many clothes shops I know of do allow you to exchange goods or issue credit notes even though they aren't required to do so by law. Even in cases where the customer is entitled to a refund (faulty goods) it seems that the legislation doesn't say it has to be cash i.e. it can be a credit note or voucher.

author by Niallpublication date Wed Nov 16, 2005 01:05author address author phone Report this post to the editors

... if something is 'faulty'.

If you buy something and it doesn't function in the way you would expect it to, or if it doesn't do the job that it claims to do etc.

If you had bought a book with missing pages, or pages stuck together or blank pages or something like that you'd have been entitled to a full cash refund. Unfortunately in this case, you're not.. You should expect some manners though or even good business sense and I would think that to have offered you a credit note or an exchange would be good business practise, at least you could have walked away with another book of your choice, shop still has your cash, everybody happy. Most shops will have the sense to do that and it's good manners. But now you won't go to that shop again.

If you buy a knife that's blunt, or a lighter that doesn't light, or a cd that skips, or a rainjacket that lets in water or the like, you are entitled by law to ask for and expect to get your money back. Credit notes or vouchers are bullshit attempts by retailers to keep your cash. You should always insist on the cash.

Basically the rule is, the goods that you buy should be expected to live up to what you expect those goods to do. If not, and even if the goods are used, like a pair of leaky wellies which you only found out were leaking after spending a day in the woods, you're still entitled to your cash refund.

author by retail therapistpublication date Wed Nov 16, 2005 02:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

If its not a legal requirement what can explain the rise in the amount of shops which offer easy refunds and exchanges?
Here's the bit i bet you didn't know, okay you probably did i just wanted to feel brainy..

Many clothing chains have made refunding and exchanging clothing easier as part of the whole marketing communications effort to ease peoples dissatisfaction with their retail experience as therapy. Everyone likes going out and buying tat to feel good about themselves, often when we get home we decide that what we bought was indeed tat, and a waste of too much money, we then feel a deep sense of guilt, if this guilt remained we would learn our lesson and buy less tat. If we tried to return it and were refused that guilt creates unpleasant feelings about the retailer who will not ease our imagined suffering.

However if it is made easy for us to return the item we are more likely to return and buy more tat, thus we bypass the need to learn the lesson. there is no longer any guilt involved. This also works on a second level where we put the item back in the bag and place it in the bottom of the wardrobe with the intention of returning it, although this will never happen, this illogical act is enough in most cases to negate the guilt. Fortunately for shops the amount of people who delude themselves and the consumer satisfaction caused by the removal of guilt leads to higher spending. Also on a high percentage of occasions refunded monies are then used to purchase something cheaper immediately afterwards in the same shop. It's win, win.

In this way marketing communications has removed much of the guilt from hedonistic and reward shopping thus making shopping as a pleasurable and therapeautic experience slide much more easily into our psyche

That explains why all those places offer refunds and exchanges, its not because they care about your legal rights its all about creating a more pleasurable and alluring consumer enviroment so that you'll spend more in the long run.

I can tell you from personal experience that wandering into the wrong sections of libraries can be very informative, much more informative than reading the work of those who oppose something. Get it from the horses mouth, its amazing what people blithely admit to in publications aimed at educating their industry, childrens advertising and marketing is especially eye opening

So from this you can guess that this book shop was too cheap to even learn the basics of marketing communications. I get the feeling that you are dissatisfied and might not shop there again unless neccessary, unfortunately all this means is that marketing communications work, those who gain your confidence in order to increase the amount of your money they take in the end are the ones we view in a favourable light.

On the other hand that shop owner is just an unthinking git, a little bit of kindness and manners would do him the world of good

 
© 2001-2021 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy