Upcoming Events

International | Environment

no events match your query!

New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link Trump Is Conditioning Removal of Sudan S... Tue Sep 29, 2020 18:02 | The New Arab

offsite link Syria‚Äôs ‚ÄúModerate Rebels‚ÄĚ Say Turk... Tue Sep 29, 2020 16:19 | Bethan McKernan

offsite link An ‚ÄėEgregious and Unforgivable Form of... Tue Sep 29, 2020 13:57 | Colin Butler

offsite link 3,500 American Companies Sue Trump Admin... Tue Sep 29, 2020 11:38 | David Shepardson

offsite link Wokeism Is Class War of the Upper Middle... Tue Sep 29, 2020 11:15 | Rob Henderson

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Azerbaijani-Armenian War: Turkish F-16s Enter The Game. Armenia Threatens To Use Iskander Missiles Tue Sep 29, 2020 21:34 | amarynth
South Front The Armenian-Azerbaijani war continues raging in the South Caucasus. As of September 29, the Azerbaijani advance in the Nagorno-Karabakh region struck the Armenian defense and Azerbaijani forces were

offsite link China deploys Sun Tzu to prevail in the Chip War Tue Sep 29, 2020 18:26 | amarynth
by Pepe Escobar with permission – first posted at Asia Times Let?s cut to the chase: with or without a sanction juggernaut, China simply won?t be expelled from the global

offsite link Come what may, I must reveal the identity of the NY Times? Trump tax leaks Tue Sep 29, 2020 15:22 | amarynth
by Ramin Mazaheri for the Saker Blog So there I was again on the ?Job Creator?s Red-Eye? (NYC to Silicon Valley) and I made this fateful, election-shaping decision. The reality

offsite link Armenian-Azerbaijani War Rages In South Caucasus Mon Sep 28, 2020 22:47 | amarynth
South Front On September 27, a new regional war in South Caucasus arose from the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over the contested Nagorno-Karabakh region. Pro-Armenian forces captured the region in the early

offsite link The mortal battle of the Perfidious Albion Mon Sep 28, 2020 19:40 | amarynth
By Katerina for the Saker Blog In this my third and hopefully last essay I will try to analyse an ingrained and totally unresolvable animosity between England and Russia. Here

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Sarah McInerney and political impartiality

offsite link Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony

offsite link Irish Examiner bias Anthony

offsite link RTE: Propaganda ambush of Sinn Fein Anthony

offsite link Hong Kong and democracy Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

offsite link UN Human Rights Council Should Address Human Rights Crisis in Cambodia Sat Aug 31, 2019 13:41 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Applicants considering appeal to end burning forest wood as renewable and carbon neutral

category international | environment | press release author Wednesday May 13, 2020 22:39author by foie Report this post to the editors

Press Release - Friends of the Irish Environment 12th May 2020

EU Biomass Case Denied Access to The Courts
Applicants considering appeal to end burning forest wood as renewable and carbon neutral

In March 2019 applicants from six countries including the USA brought a claim stating that the EUís 2018 Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) will devastate forests and increase greenhouse gas emissions by promoting burning forest wood as renewable and carbon neutral.

On 11 May 2020 the EU Court published an order that the applicants who have brought this case, including individuals and groups from Estonia, France, Ireland, Romania and Slovakia, do not have legal standing and that it will not therefore make a decision on whether or not the biomass provisions of RED II should be annulled.

Dr Mary Booth, the director of the Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI), who spearheaded the case and was an expert witness, said:

ďWe disagree with the Courtís finding on standing. The Court should strike down the biomass provisions of the RED II due to their incompatibility with core principles of EU environmental law. The European Commissionís own science staff [Ref 1] have stated that Ďsustainabilityí criteria such as those included in the RED II are Ďnot sufficient to ensure climate change mitigation,í an important admission that the EU put in place Potemkin sustainability criteria that do not protect forests and the climate. It is critical that the court hear this case, which is of fundamental importance to EU climate policy. We are working with the applicants and legal advisers to determine whether the applicants will bring an appeal against this decision which denies them access to the courts.Ē

A recent report [Ref 2] found that EU member states are paying out over Ä6.5 billion in subsidies per year to biomass burning facilities, a figure that does not include additional support to increase residential wood burning.

Dr. Booth said, ďThe EU has committed to net-zero emissions by 2050 and is proposing to dramatically strengthen GHG reduction targets. Paying people to burn wood for energy and simply counting the emissions as zero, as the EU now does, is hollowing out forests and actually increasing GHG emissions. Stopping this practice is essential climate mitigation Ė which is what we desperately need.Ē

Tony Lowes, a Director of Friends of the Irish Environment who represented Ireland in the international case, said that the case 'highlighted the need for the promised Guidelines from the Commission on what measures can be appealed directly to Luxembourg and which need to go through the national courts.í

Contact:
International: Mary Booth, PFPI: mbooth@pfpi.net | +1 917-885-2573
Ireland: Tony Lowes, 353 (0)87 2176316

Refs:
1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:1bdc63bd-b7e9-11e6-9e3c-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
2. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/burnout-eu-clean-energy-policies-forest-destruction-ip.pdf

Background
Plaintiffs from Estonia, France, Ireland, Romania, Slovakia, and the US brought the case based on the harms from logging and biomass burning they have already suffered, and anticipation of future impacts as financial support for bioenergy continues to soar. The plaintiffs represent areas that have been particularly hard hit, such as Estonia, the Carpathian Mountain forests in eastern Europe, where some of Europeís last remaining primeval forests are being intensively logged, and as far afield as the US South East where natural forests are being clear felled and burned to fuel the EU industry.
In addition to PFPI, the Center for Climate Integrity (US) and Fern (EU) provided support and assistance to the case and to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are represented by attorneys from Leigh Day, Matrix Chambers, and 11KBW, all with offices based in London.

For more information on the case, see www.eubiomasscase.org

For the ruling, see http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=226323&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=626769
Copyright © 2020 Friends of the Irish Environment, All rights reserved.
Press Release

Our mailing address is:
Friends of the Irish Environment
Kilcatherine
Eyeries, Cork P75 CX53
Ireland

Related Link: https://www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.org/press-releases
© 2001-2020 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy