Independent Media Centre Ireland

Lacking Trasparency: The Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership (TTIP)

category international | anti-capitalism | feature author Saturday November 29, 2014 17:45author by Shane Cassidy - noneauthor email shanejcassidy at gmail dot com

featured image

This article examines the Transatlantic Free Trade agreement and it's potential repercussions. In 2010 the US mining and gas company, Renco, managed to successfully avoid having to pay compensation to Peruvian locals who were harmed due to pollution by their companies by successfully using a provision of the Peru-US Trade Agreement[1]. Not satisfied with avoiding having to pay compensation, the company has since demanded $800 million from the Peruvian government as they argue that one of the companies they own, Doe Run, was forced into bankruptcy due to an expensive pollution clean-up which the Peruvian government required Doe Run to conduct [2].

In 2010 the US mining and gas company, Renco, managed to successfully avoid having to pay compensation to Peruvian locals who were harmed due to pollution by their companies by successfully using a provision of the Peru-US Trade Agreement[1]. Not satisfied with avoiding having to pay compensation, the company has since demanded $800 million from the Peruvian government as they argue that one of the companies they own, Doe Run, was forced into bankruptcy due to an expensive pollution clean-up which the Peruvian government required Doe Run to conduct [2].

It is with this understanding that on Monday 10th March of this year, the fourth round of negotiations of the Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement ( TAFTA )or the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) got under way. In a nutshell, TTIP claims to be a free trade agreement between the US and EU which will lead to an increase in employment and income in both economic areas and create the largest free trade area in the world[3]. This agreement, if implemented, will have far-reaching and potentially very dangerous consequences and yet practically nothing has been written on the subject in the media and discussion on the matter is worryingly absent.

Total disregard has thus far been shown to the citizens of both the US and the EU as this treaty is being kept secret from the populations who will be subjected to them, though not of course from the hundreds of corporate lawyers and lobbyists who are carefully writing them[4]. The EU Commissioner for Trade, Karel de Gucht, had previously stated that he would not accept the US’s push to allow business interests a bigger role in negotiations before later stating that he was “ready to work in that direction”[5]. Furthermore, US President Barack Obama has also further added to the erosion of the democratic process by successfully securing approval from Congress for his fast-track negotiating authority[6]. Therefore, a highly secretive, wholly undemocratic process is being pursued with the ultimate aim that the ordinary citizens will be expected to accept this deal without question.

Supporters of the treaty have argued that the negotiation and eventual implementation of this agreement will provide financial growth and jobs on both sides of the Atlantic. Responding to an article written by the journalist George Monbiot in which he criticized the TTIP, the Conservative British politician Ken Clarke stated “By best estimates, (the TTIP) will deliver a £10bn annual boost to the British economy alone, increase collective output by as much as £180bn, create thousands of jobs, and deliver lower prices and more choice to consumers.” However these figures have already been proven to be highly exaggerated and a inflated version of reality by Ferdi de Ville of Ghent University and Gabriel Siles-Brügge of the University of Manchester, in their study of the financial benefits of the TTIP ( available here:[7] . The main beneficiaries of this agreement will undoubtedly be the businesses and corporations who will have a much broader platform where they can maximise profits at the expense of the workers and operating with practical impunity thanks to the Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provision.

Of all the proposals under this treaty, the most concerning aspects of the negotiations is the inclusion of the ISDS provision. This particular inclusion is not new to the TTIP as it was first introduced to trade agreements to protect companies who wished to set up in countries where the rule of law and court system were very weak[8]. The ISDS conferred special legal powers upon companies to sue their host countries in special offshore tribunals, governed by corporate lawyers, should their rights be infringed upon. However both the EU and US possess strong judicial systems and the inclusion of this ISDS provision has proved to be highly controversial. Under the ISDS, individual corporations will be elevated to the position of equal authority among nation states and will have the ability to bypass domestic courts in place of an international arbitrary tribunal which has the power to demand the State to compensate the corporation for a perceived loss of earnings due to the State changing public policy. This compensation will naturally be passed on to taxpayers which creates a worrying situation for citizens while simultaneously awarding overwhelming power to the private companies.

For example, should a tobacco company interpret legislation, which is introduced to increase awareness of cigarettes harmful effects, as a barrier to their trading abilities then they will have a platform to take that State to this tribunal to demand compensation. This has already occurred in both Uruguay and Australia, where the largest cigarette company in the world, Phillip Morris, has taken both countries to court for introducing anti-smoking legislation as their fear of losing profits is far greater than their concern for the health Australia or Uruguay’s citizens[9]. Unfortunately this is not a new development in bi-lateral trade agreements; Lori Wallach the director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch and vocal opponent of this trade deal, is on record as stating that this is nothing short of a “corporate invasion”[10].

Several arguments have been put forward to support the negotiation in private of the TTIP, principally that if the US were to get their hands on the approach the EU were going to take towards the negotiations, or vice versa, then this would make it a lot harder to effectively negotiate. However, in order to ensure as much transparency as possible, surely once both parties have concluded negotiations on a particular subject, it should be released into the public domain. As it stands, the public is not entitled to know anything about what is being agreed upon save to be continuously told by corporate interests of the importance of accepting the free trade agreement for the sake of jobs. What this agreement between the US and EU will lead to is a serious curtailing of the governance authority of nation states, to the benefit of corporations. A society constructed and controlled by business interests is highly destructive to the social fabric and all measures must be put in place to combat this. A resounding rejection of any agreement which hasn’t been first presented to the public is the only way to ensure that overreaching corporate dominance doesn’t become a reality.




[4] In discussion with Noam Chomsky, Jan 08 2014







Comments (13 of 13)

Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
author by fredpublication date Fri Nov 28, 2014 18:48author address author phone

The TTIP was brought up twice in the vincent brown debate on membership of the EU.
(organised by the Ballyhea bank debt campaign group in Charleville Co.Cork.)

Worth watching for that and notably for ming's rousing speech to finish it off

author by Crazy Catpublication date Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:50author address author phone

Here is a petition site to stop the talks on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership or TTIP.

author by Crazy Cat - date Mon Dec 15, 2014 13:52author address author phone

As It says, a 2 minute video on TTIP made in US:

author by Crazy Cat - date Sat Dec 20, 2014 13:53author address author phone

This is a very good initiative being taken in regard to TTIP.

County councils are declaring themselves 'out of TTIP' (hors TAFTA)

I add this video from where I got the info, even though it's in French it would be worth subtitles.

author by Crazy Catpublication date Fri Jan 16, 2015 15:33author address author phone

The latest article from George Monbiot.

And the official EU negotiating texts in TTIP

author by KMpublication date Mon Jan 19, 2015 23:01author address author phone

Unlike Enda, the Austrian Chancellor is prepared to fight the TTIP.

The Chancellor of Austria, Werner Faymann, has warned that Austria could take a case before the EU Court of Justice
over the EU’s intention to sign the Transatlantic Trade and nvestment Partnership (TTIP) with the United States.

According to Faymann, corporations are:

“already powerful enough and should not be handed all the power. We have looked the other way for too long while corporations were establishing a world of their own on a global level, such as tax loopholes. That led the world to the 2008 crash. It is contrary to the democratic ethics of countries like Austria that they should be given a special court and a special right to lawsuits,” he said. He was “convinced that the US as a country with the rule of law is strong enough to refrain from such special legal proceedings.”

Related Link:
author by Crazy Catpublication date Sat Jan 31, 2015 19:31author address author phone

See this picture :

Translation : “there can be no democratic choice against the European treaties”.

So says Mr Juncker, well we have known that democracy dissapeared in France after the Lisbon Treaty in 2005, and here it's clearly confirmed by Mr; Juncker

Source le Figaro:

you have to subscribe to get the whole article, sorry.

Related Link:
author by People's Movementpublication date Mon Feb 02, 2015 20:38author address author phone

This is from Connolly media. A presentation by Dr Paul O'Connell on the the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). See also the Stop the TTIP leaflet produced by the People's Movement

PDF Document Stop the TTIP leaflet by the People's Movement 0.34 Mb

Caption: Video Id: 108948150 Type: Vimeo
Stop the TTIP! by Dr Paul O

Related Link:
TTIP: Regulations Handcuffed
author by Crazy Catpublication date Fri Feb 06, 2015 10:03author address author phone

Article from the Corporate Europe Observatory:

And this:

finally something about TTIP in the mainstream irish internet press
author by fredpublication date Fri May 01, 2015 00:49author address author phone

Philip morris sueing Ireland over plain packaging is a wake up call for Ireland.

Richard Bruton has clearly been got at by our US friends and is actively cheerleading ISDS in TTIP

good article
author by fredpublication date Sun May 24, 2015 22:40author address author phone

another interesting article about the economics of free trade agreements
and how it falls apart on closer analysis and comparison with what goes on in the real world

another TTIP article
author by fredpublication date Fri Jun 05, 2015 14:26author address author phone

As bought and paid for privatisation ideologues in FG wax lyrical about TTIP,
here's another timely article on the subject by Paul Craig Roberts to help counter their lies and spin:

Rule By The Corporations - TTIP: The Corporate Empowerment Act

Some extracts:

The Transatlantic and Transpacific Trade and Investment Partnerships have nothing to do with free trade. “Free trade” is used as a disguise to hide the power these agreements give to corporations to use law suits to overturn sovereign laws of nations that regulate pollution, food safety, GMOs, and minimum wages.


What the “partnerships” do is to make private corporations immune to the laws of sovereign countries on the grounds that laws of countries adversely impact corporate profits and constitute “restraint of trade.”

For example, under the Transatlantic Partnership, French laws against GMOs would be overturned as “restraints on trade” by law suits filed by Monsanto.

Countries that require testing of imported food, such as pork for trichnosis, and fumigation would be subject to lawsuits from corporations, because these regulations increase the cost of imports.

Countries that do not provide monopoly protection for brand name pharmaceuticals and chemical products, and allow generics in their place, can be sued for damages by corporations.

Obama himself has no input into the process. Here is what is going on: The Trade Representative is a corporate stooge. He serves the private corporations and will go on to a million dollar annual salary. The corporations have bribed the political leaders in every country to sign away their sovereignty and the general welfare of their people to private corporations. Corporations have paid US senators large sums for transferring Congress’ law-making powers to corporations. When these “partnerships” pass, no country that signed will have any legislative authority to legislate or enforce any law that any corporation regards as inimical to its bottom line....

Divided EU lawmakers postpone vote on TTIP
author by Crazy Catpublication date Wed Jun 10, 2015 10:35author address author phone

Better keep hassling them during the summer!


Indymedia Ireland is a media collective. We are independent volunteer citizen journalists producing and distributing the authentic voices of the people. Indymedia Ireland is an open news project where anyone can post their own news, comment, videos or photos about Ireland or related matters.