Finally, Germany Is Talking About Deutschland EU Exit - Dexit 22:57 Apr 21 0 comments
The EU in 2019 – the Problem of Survival 18:42 Jan 11 0 comments
People's News - No. 139 7th Feb 2016 22:58 Feb 10 0 comments
Peoples News issue No. 110 Date: 21 – 9 – 14 22:01 Oct 01 1 commentsmore >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony
A Blog About Human Rights
Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights
Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights
Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights
Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights
US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights
Stay Sceptical. Control the Hysteria. Save Lives.
New York Times Fact Checks ?Deceiving? CDC on Masks and Outdoor Transmission Thu May 13, 2021 09:17 | Will Jones
News Round Up Thu May 13, 2021 02:54 | Jonathan Barr
CDC Finds More Clotting Cases After Johnson & Johnson Covid Vaccine Wed May 12, 2021 23:34 | Michael Curzon
?He Had Won the Victory Over Himself. He Loved the Lockdown.? Wed May 12, 2021 22:21 | Toby Young
Not So SAGE After All: A Review of the Latest Models Wed May 12, 2021 15:48 | Toby Young
Important Background & Analysis on SCG ("Fiscal Compact") Treaty, for Dáil Debate on Irish Referendum (Wed., Thurs., Fri.)
national | eu | opinion/analysis Wednesday April 18, 2012 13:00 by O.O'C. - National Platform EU Research & Information Centre 24 Crawford Avenue, Dublin 9 01-8305792
A referendum on the Fiscal Treaty (‘SCG’/Stability, Coordination and Governance) is to be held in Ireland in May but the related European Stability Mechanism Treaty (‘ESM’) is not to be similarly scrutinised, much less put to the people for approval. Yet both treaties are explicitly linked and interdependent. According to the ESM Treaty both treaties are ’complementary’. The ESM Treaty is illegal under EU law as it stands and is therefore unconstitutional, being in breach of existing EU treaty principles which have been approved by the Irish people in previous referendums and are now part of our law.
Under the Irish Constitution economic, fiscal and budgetary powers are entrusted by the people to the Executive. But under the ESM Treaty a new permanent €700bn loan fund - the ESM - is to be set up with power to call on Ireland, at a time of that institution’s choosing, to make contributions of up to €11.15bn in various forms of capital 'irrevocably and unconditionally' (Art. 8 ESM Treaty). This is equivalent to one-third of Tax Revenue for 2011. This figure can be increased at the sole behest of the ESM at any time in the future - without limit.
The 27-Member European Council used a 'simplified' procedure introduced into the EU Treaties by the Treaty of Lisbon for this purpose. Under this procedure the European Council can make amendments in the policy areas of EU Treaties as long as such amendments do not increase the Union’s powers and competences.
The amendment reads in part: 'The Member States whose currency is the euro may establish a stability mechanism to be activated if indispensable to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole.'
This means in effect putting the Economic and Monetary Union on a wholly new basis from the one which Ireland signed up to under the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties - making it more a Fiscal Union for the Eurozone incorporating a range of new supranational controls over national budgetary policy.
The amendment does not say that 'some' Member States may establish such a mechanism, but 'The Member States', i.e. all of them.
Yet the ESM Treaty can come into effect once eight, a minority, of the 17 Eurozone States – viz. those subscribing 90% of the permanent loan capital – ratify it, while the Fiscal Compact Treaty can come into force once 12 Eurozone States do so.
The ESM Treaty which the Government wishes to ratify would set up an Economic and Monetary Union on quite different principles from the EMU which the Irish people agreed to accede to under the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties. The current EMU is based on the 3% of GDP maximum annual deficit rule and the 60% of GDP maximum government debt rule.
If these rules had been enforced there would probably be no euro crisis. It was because they were expected to be enforced that the Art.125 'no bailout' rule was inserted into the EU Treaties.
But when Germany and France broke these 'excessive deficit' rules in 2003 those Treaty provisions were effectively abandoned. It was as a consequence of this failure that the Eurozone debt crisis erupted and it is to deal with that failure and to find a way round the Art.125 'no bailout' provision in the EU Treaties that the 17 Eurozone Governments have agreed the ESM Treaty and the complementary Fiscal Compact Treaty for just the Eurozone countries.
These two Eurozone Treaties are therefore in breach of EU law and the EU Treaties in that they would:
Instead, the Government claims that if the people reject the Fiscal Treaty in the 31 May referendum, then the State will be ineligible to seek ESM funding it might require after 2013.
Such an assertion is profoundly misleading. The clause threatening this was not in an earlier ESM Treaty which was signed by Mr Michael Noonan and the other Eurozone Finance Ministers in July 2011 but which was never sent round for ratification. It was however put into a second ESM Treaty which was signed in February 2012 and which the Oireachtas is now expected to approve ratifying so that it can come into force by this July - even though the Art.136 amendment that authorises it does not come force until 2013.
Moreover, this earlier ESM Treaty provided for 'burning' bondholders and for private investors to make sacrifices as a condition of Eurozone Governments getting ESM loans. That provision was dropped from the ESM Treaty which now awaits Irish ratification.
The Government must explain why they allowed these changes and, more importantly, they have a serious obligation to do everything possible to protect the country’s interests in this unusual situation.
We hope that TD's will agree, and that this position will inform their input into the forthcoming parliamentary debate on these two Eurozone treaties.