Lún 30 An Spréach Housing Protestmore >>
Germany: Large-scale police operation against refugees in Berlin 19:14 Lún 27 0 comments
Mayo needs to wake up to Fracking 23:37 Lún 25 0 comments
What's really going on with Ukraine 06:54 Lún 24 0 comments
Peoples News issue no. 108 Date: 8 – 8 – 14 09:19 Lún 15 0 comments
If Ireland was treated like Palestine - An alternate history 23:37 Iúil 29 0 commentstuileadh >>
Seán Sheehan - Déar Lún 28, 2014 10:07
Two Ways of Seeing: Review of Exhibitions by Kazimir Malevich and Dennis Hopper Tate Modern is currently home (until 26 October) to a major Malevich retrospective, the likes of which has not been seen in Britain before, while at the Royal Academy there is an exhibition of over 400 photographs taken by Dennis Hopper and on show in Britain for the first time. Malevich and Hopper are both regarded as radical figures who challenged convention but their differences outweigh any perceived similarities. This is not down to painting and photography being different art forms but to the uncrossable gulf between someone who revolutionised the nature of art and someone who happened to be around at a time of social change and captured aspects of it with a camera. Malevich experienced the October Revolution and then enacted it artistically, dramatically tearing down the old canvas and inaugurating a new way of representing reality. But like most such sweeping summaries, it occludes the history that leads up to a significant moment, washing it over with a rhetorical flourish that rinses out a meaningful understanding. What distinguishes the Tate retrospective is its resolve to show Malevich developing as an artist in a particular place, Russia, and at particular times, from pre-revolutionary tsarism through to Stalinism. Born in 1879 into a Polish family in Kiev, Malevich travelled to Moscow as a young man, discovered impressionism, saw the work of Van Gogh, Gauguin and Matisse and began to develop his own style of painting while still feeling he had to speak the language of the western avant-garde. This shows in his Self-Portrait of 1908-10 which takes from Gauguin a compositional ploy which positions the image in front of a painting ? a just discernible scene of bathers in this case ? while presenting himself as dapper and urbane. Room Two of the exhibition shows him as an artist drawn to Russian themes and styles, painting rural workers using simple forms and expressive colours to portray their hard-working, honest lifestyles. The Scyther of 1911-12 reveals the influence of modernism without sacrificing allegiance to a Russian cultural identity. The figure is barefoot, as poor peasants would have been, set against a warm red background signifying the rye harvest; the farmer?s form and mass is far from traditional representational art but the word for the colour red in the Russian language also denotes something beautiful (hence, Red Square) and this is also part of the painting?s iconography.
Irish Left Review - Déar Lún 28, 2014 08:39
PUBLIC MEETING Latin America Today, Saturday 14:00, Connolly Books Oscar Medina from Venezuela will give a presentation on contemporary Latin American politics and the role of the left. Oscar is a member of the Connolly Youth Movement and has been active in left wing and communist politics in Latin America.
Michael Taft - Céad Lún 27, 2014 13:04
Question: why has employment growth collapsed in the first half of the year after recent claims by the Government that 60,000 jobs per year were being created? The answer lies in statistical misunderstanding, Government spin and the failure of many commentators to read the numbers correctly. For the fact is that the 60,000 job-creation number was never real and the recovery in the labour market is sluggish at best. This post may get a bit involved but stay with me ? for this is as much a story about how the recovery is being contrived as it is about bald numbers. Last year, employment growth suddenly took off. In 2012 employment actually fell by 11,000 ? and this was after a loss of nearly 300,000 since the start of the crisis. However, in 2013 everything changed. Employment grew on a full-year basis by 43,000 (this is consistent with claims by the Government who were using quarter-to-quarter figures). This was quite a turnaround. The Government claimed their policies were working. For many commentators this was proof that recovery had returned. But there were a couple of problems.
John Ross - Máirt Lún 26, 2014 10:56
This article was originally posted on John's blog, Key Trends in Globalisation on the 23rd of August. August 22, 2014 is the 110th anniversary of the birth of Deng Xiaoping. Numerous achievements would ensure Deng Xiaoping a major position in China's history ? his role in shaping the People's Republic of China, his steadfastness during persecution in the Cultural Revolution, his extraordinarily balanced attitude even after return to power towards the development and recent history of China, his all-round role after 1978 in leading the country. But one ensures him a position among a tiny handful of people at the peak not only of Chinese but of world history. This was China's extraordinary economic achievement after reforms began in 1978, and the decisive role this played not only in the improvement of the living standards of Chinese people but the country's national rejuvenation. So great was the impact of this that it may objectively be said to have altered the situation not only of China but of the world. China's economic performance after the beginning of its 1978 reforms simply exceeded the experience of any other country in human history. To give only a partial list:
Michael Taft - Luan Lún 25, 2014 13:31
If you?re into perverse economics, then you?re going to love the debate in the run-up to the budget. Already we have Minister Simon Harris calling for income tax cuts (didn?t the Taoiseach tell Ministers last year to shut-up during pre-budget discussions?). Of course, there is almost no discussion regarding affordable childcare, reducing education costs or introducing universal pre-primary education, providing affordable pay-related pensions to all workers, reducing health costs, reversing the high levels of deprivation and poverty, etc. Almost no discussion at all about how we can improve our living standards. But of real interest to fans of the perverse is that while Ministers and interest groups line up to demand tax cuts, the Government will be introducing an extremely regressive ?tax? on almost all households ? and there is no discussion about how this can be avoided. I am referring to the water charge. While there has been considerable discussion about the costs to the average household (measuring showers, baths, brushing teeth), there has been little reference to the distributional impact of the charges; that is, the impact on different income groups. Let?s see if we can start to fill this gap. Of course, we don?t have a history of water charges to measure so let?s look at waste collection charges. User charges, like sales taxes (VAT, excise) are generally regressive ? they impact more on low/average groups. This is in the nature of the tax as lower income groups consume, whether goods or water or waste, more of their income than high income groups. The CSO Household Budget Survey provides information on waste collection charges from 2009/10.
There are two things worth noting about the above chart.
Sarah Clancy - Déar Lún 21, 2014 11:35
&white& or cead mile failte, are you here for the torture? &white& In case you had managed to misremember how much our country hates us along comes another woman needing shelter; because someone transgressed against her she needs help from us, just for the moment until all this is behind her, and do we make her welcome? Does she get the help she needs? Ah you know the answer: does she hell- this country hates the likes of her this country rapes the likes of her, we will leave her with her bodily integrity in tatters while psychiatrists fight it out about her psyche and noone will ask her opinion on what?s to be done with her she is not considered sentient and our state penetrates her over and over and over- &white& this woman will be incorporated as evidence in a poisonous debate that skims over how very many ways the state we?ve built is willing to degrade us, she will get a code name and become a touchstone, something (not someone) that we can talk about in concerned tones on Marion Finucane and we will shake our heads and say it?s clear now that our state hates us as if we hadn?t always known it as if we haven't always felt it as if it hasn?t been the subtext of our paths through life to womanhood- &white& men friends it?s clear now too, that if you are so inclined you could rape us, and in all but a few cases you?d serve no sentence not only that lads but here in our little Ireland you could impregnate us, force a conception that we played no part in, then you could sit back and wait for our institutions to force motherhood upon us and they?ll do it- they?ve proved it even if they have to perforate our mouths with tubes and force feed us, even if they have to sedate us then slice our wombs open with surgical knives, they can and obviously will do it and deep down we always knew this: we knew Savita Halappanavar we knew the Kerry Babies we knew of lonely deaths on wet nights in Granard and the A,B, C, and X cases &white& and the fortunate amongst us, the ones with resources know what ferry terminals look like at night time and how much it costs to raise a child in all sorts of currencies, we know whether we are or are not up for it there should be no shame in that but here, well, we must keep it secret because of how much our state hates us, when we make love we take the risk of ending up in hospital in a country where if you?re a pregnant woman ?state care? is an oxymoron, it?s a shame to say that as long as we have the capacity to bear children, Ireland is not a safe place for us; women, rise up, this country hates us it?s long past time we changed it enough is way too much this time. &white& &white& Referendum now - repeal the 8th Amendment.
Sarah ClancyImage from a video of a protest which took place on Wednesday the 20th of August at the Spire in O'Connell St, Dublin. Courtesy of USI and Paula Geraghty.
Mark Kernan - Déar Lún 21, 2014 11:15
Ask the vast majority of people who said that and it is a fair bet they will probably reply something like: Josef Goebbels, or maybe Stalin perhaps, Saddam Hussein might even come up, maybe even Henry Kissinger, or maybe even, in a lucid moment, they might reply Rupert Murdoch, or for that matter Denis O Brien. The truth is they would be wrong on all accounts. Although they would at least be relatively close with the last two or three.
But no, none of them said it, but it is a sure bet that all of the above names would understand the sentiment.
The quote is the first sentence from a 1928 book called Propaganda. The writer was Edward Bernays who many regard as the founder of modern public relations. As a bold and declarative sentence it leaves you in no doubt what so ever as to the logic underlying the words.
That is, the masses can be first organised and manipulated and secondly, even more important, they must be if ?democracy? as it is largely understood today is to fulfil its function in maintaining market-driven politics. The logic therefore is that ?the people?, the great mainstay of democratic theory and thought or so we are told, cannot and should not be trusted.
Irish Left Review - Déar Lún 21, 2014 10:33
The Marxist Seminars are back! After our initial 6 seminars based on theoretical topics, we thought we?d run the next 6 on ?Marxism in Practice?. We will be beginning on Saturday 9th August, 6pm, Chaplin?s Bar, Hawkins? Street, D2. Each seminar will be at the same time and venue fortnightly thereafter. Miles Link will be introducing the first seminar and will be put the case forward for the Frankfurt School of ideas. Western Marxism: Problems of mass culture. A lively debate will surely follow as always. The full programme is the following:
Communist Party of Ireland - Déar Lún 21, 2014 09:41
Contents: 1. Israel: outpost of imperialism The self-proclaimed ?international community? is much preoccupied lately with international law and human rights, and is busy devising and implementing economic sanctions against Russia, Iran, and Syria, among others, allegedly for their real or supposed transgressions. 2. Demand grows for a living wage The economic crisis that went global after Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008 is not over, but the free-market system appears, for the time being at least, to have stabilised. Output is increasing while unemployment is falling in Britain, the United States, and even Spain. 3. They simply don?t care Western governments and media are using the shooting down of Malaysian Airlines flight MH170, with 295 people on board, as a further pretext for pushing for wider sanctions against Russia, which may push the world closer to a war on the European continent. 4. Time for women to get back to activism Speaking at a seminar of communist and workers? parties on the role of communists in the struggle for the parity and emancipation of women in Brussels in March 2010, Lynda Walker, national chairperson of the Communist Party of Ireland, said: ?In the struggle for parity, for women?s emancipation and for socialism we understand the reactionary role that the European Union is playing and the role of British imperialism. 5. An independent political programme for the trade union movement and for workers A declaration by the Trade Union Left Forum: Where is the ambition? Jack O?Connor has said on a number of occasions that the ?left? lacks ambition and courage. This is certainly true of the official trade union movement. It lacks ambition, courage, and vision. 6. Shared slaughter in an ignoble cause We are surrounded on all sides by a cacophony of noise about events, media features and academic feastings to celebrate the beginning of the war of 1914?18. ?Co-ordinated? is the adjective that occurs to sceptical minds. 7. The First World War and a century of slaughter Statement by the Communist Party of Ireland The 31st of July is the centenary of the outbreak of the First World War, which resulted in the slaughter of more than nine million people, with millions more wounded and left physically and emotionally traumatised. It was the first ?industrial? war, fought on a scale unprecedented in history. 8. A song for Palestine The Lives of Strangers Eoghan O?Neill 9. Venezuela has more democracy than the United States Venezuela is one of the countries that most appreciate their democracy. This is the conclusion of the Chilean NGO ?Latinobarómetro? following its study of democratic evaluation in the Latin America populations. 10. Spain?s grass-roots revolution Protest goes political! The huge anti-austerity demonstration by ?indignados? (the indignant) in Madrid on 15 May 2011 generated mass protests in all the main Spanish cities, involving millions of workers. 11. The law of unintended consequences In bourgeois economics, numerous rules and laws have developed to obscure the class nature of society and the existence of the class struggle. Adam Smith?s ?invisible hand? is also the law of unintended consequences. 12. Liam and Tom O?Flaherty Summer School The Liam and Tom O?Flaherty Society has announced its second Summer School, following last year?s hugely successful inauguration. It will be held once again in Inis Mór (Árainn), the birthplace of these two great writers, on the last weekend in August, Saturday and Sunday the 30th and 31st. 13. Return of the Brute This is perhaps a good time to look at the first Irish anti-war novel, Liam O?Flaherty?s Return of the Brute. When the First World War ended, in 1918, it seemed unimaginable that there could ever be such slaughter again. The arts in particular reflected the sense of exploded bodies and the insanity, a world that had spiralled out of control.
William Wall - Luan Lún 18, 2014 22:32
People often ask me why I write such dark books. You?re such a sunny person, they say. I say: Look around you, what kind of a country do you think you?re living in? Here is a tale of the island of Saints and Sadists. A young woman came to our country for help, for a home, for safety. We call her an immigrant and it has become a bad word in the way that the simple trade of tinker became a bad word when I was a boy. And sometimes we call them refugees, which is even a worse word. Or fugees. At least we?re not racist about it. It applies to anyone in distress who asks us to take them in. And she had been raped in her own country and she found she was pregnant when she came into the care of our state and we carried out the usual compulsory medical examination. And nobody told her you couldn?t have an abortion in Ireland. And nobody told her that our state has fought long and hard to force women to keep babies until they are born and then our state has fought long and hard to take their babies away from them and give them to decent people who deserve them or to the nuns. Because our state cares for women. In the way that any decent man cares for his woman. And there are 221 men in our parliament and only 25 women. So that?s a lot of caring.