How to become a terrorist 08:36 Iúil 25 0 comments
Easter Rising Walking Tour 17:53 Iúil 21 0 comments
Israeli airstrikes hit al-Rimal, Khan Younis, Beit Lahia; death toll over 100 for Sunday alone 23:11 Iúil 20 3 comments
Hacking Online Polls and Other Ways British Spies Seek to Control the Internet 00:48 Iúil 15 2 comments
The recent Ebola outbreak 19:28 Iúil 03 1 commentstuileadh >>
Seán Sheehan - Céad Iúil 02, 2014 15:32
Book Review: Phantom Home, Ahlam Shibli (Hatje Cantz, 2013) The sudden and violent death of someone close to you can only intensify the grief and feeling of loss that accompanies any bereavement, so much so that looking at a picture of the person may be too unbearable to bear. The raw and unavoidable facticity of someone?s absence becomes a too-painfully presence that would be compounded by a photograph that makes the ordeal even more difficult to cope with. This is understandable and it takes an effort of imagination and empathy to comprehend another kind of response when the sudden and violent death is a public and political moment in the life of a community that is itself living with an ongoing sense of loss and deprivation. Palestinians living in their land under occupation by Israel have witnessed death at the hands of their occupiers for most of their lives and seen the destruction of their homes and crops. They live with daily indignities that prevent them from travelling on certain roads in the West Bank, they suffer from a grossly unfair allocation of water and they observe the expansion of settlements for Israeli colonizers. Ahlam Shibli, a Palestinian photographer, explores the visual culture -- posters, murals, banners, paintings, photographs and graffiti ? of the community of Nablus as it commemorates those accorded the status of martyrs: Palestinians killed fighting Israeli forces, civilians killed in Israeli attacks and suicide bombers whose missions took them into Israel.
Pablo Iglesias: ?put a stop to the grand coalition that is imposing austerity and financial totalitarianism.?
Richard - Céad Iúil 02, 2014 15:03
This is a rush translation of the address by Podemos MEP Pablo Iglesias to the European Parliament this morning, on the occasion of presenting his candidacy for President of the European Parliament. Original text via Público. It is an honour to speak to you all in presenting my candidacy for the presidency of this chamber. This parliament is called upon to represent the sovereignty of Europe and we must, fellow deputies, live up to what that means today. The dream of Europe has been buried many times but it always managed to awake once again. This is what happened nearly 70 years ago: Europe awoke again in the resistance of its peoples against fascism, in the survivors of the extermination camps, in those who gave their lives for justice and for freedom. Thousands of my own compatriots, who had struggled to defend democracy in Spain, took part in that struggle and that dream of justice. You cannot imagine the pride I have as a Spanish person that the first tanks that entered Paris to liberate it were manned by Spanish combatants. Today, as intolerance and xenophobia threaten us once again, I want to call upon Europe?s memory of antifascism, and that of all those peoples who love freedom and democracy. My fellow deputies, the best of our continent and our common history was forged in the revolutions that made the people the subject of rights, above kings, gods, noblemen and major property owners. The best heritage of Europe is the will of its citizens to be free and to be the serfs of no-one. To be no-one?s serf, my fellow deputies, that is democracy. That is why I must tell you today that the peoples to whom we owe our social freedoms and rights did not struggle for a Europe in which its people live in fear of poverty, of exclusion, of unemployment or of abandonment when faced with illness. The expropriation of sovereignty and subjection to the rule of financial elites threaten the present and the future of Europe, they threaten our dignity, they threaten equality, liberty and fraternity, they threaten our life in common. The creation of new supranational entities does not have to come at the price of leaving the citizens helpless. Our peoples are not children, nor are they colonies of any investment fund. They did not win and defend their freedom so as to hand it over to a financial oligarchy. These are not abstract terms, my fellow deputies: all of you are well aware of the problem. The ease with which lobbies in the service of major corporations move around here is scandalous, as are the revolving doors that turn public representatives into millionaires in the pay of big businesses. We have to say it loud and clear: this way of operating robs the peoples of their sovereignty, attacks democracy, and turns political representatives into a caste. My fellow deputies, democracy in Europe has been the victim of authoritarian erosion. In the European periphery the situation is tragic: our countries have almost become protectorates, new colonies, where powers that no-one has elected are destroying social rights and threatening the social and political cohesion of our societies.
Irish Left Review - Máirt Iúil 01, 2014 16:48
A Unite the Union Seminar
Unite offices (Matt Merrigan Hall), 55/56 Middle Abbey Street, Dublin 1
Thursday 10th July, 9.30am ? appr. 1.30pmHow can we ensure that all workers in Ireland earn a Living Wage or above? Research shows that Irish wages in the private sector are well below other European countries, despite the fact that Irish productivity is high and Irish profits are growing. This is not just a feature of the traditional low-paid sectors - retail and hospitality. Even in the manufacturing and professional services sectors, low pay persists. This seminar will examine how robust wage floors can help produce a wage-led recovery. Schedule:
09.00 Registration, tea/coffee
Chair: Siobhán O?Donoghue, Director, Uplift
David Begg, General Secretary, Irish Congress of Trade Unions
09.40 Why the economy needs a pay rise
Prof Terrence McDonough, NUI Galway
10.00 Minimum Essential Standards of Living: Expenditure and a Living Wage
Sr Bernadette McMahon, Vincentian Partnership
10.15 Raising the floor: Driving up the Minimum Wage
Dr Rory O?Farrell, Nevin Economic Research Institute
10.30 Raising the floor: Increasing hours
Brian Forbes, National Co-Ordinator, Mandate trade union
10.45 Is there a case for an enhanced system of JLCs?
Dr Joe Wallace, University of Limerick
11.00 Panel discussion ? beneficiaries of improved wage floors (tea/coffee)
Representatives from National Women?s Council of Ireland, Migrant Rights
Centre Ireland, Civil and Public Services Union and We?re Not Leaving.
(5 minute presentations followed by discussion)
12 noon Strategies for raising the floor
Michael Taft, Research Officer, Unite the Union
John Douglas, President, Irish Congress of Trade Unions
Jimmy Kelly, Regional Secretary, Unite the Union
For information or to reserve a place contact firstname.lastname@example.orgTime & Date Thursday 10th July, 9.30am ? appr. 1.30pm
Tom O'Brien - Luan Meith 30, 2014 14:49
This week I am delighted to welcome back the economist, economic historian, and extremely prolific author, Professor Michael Perelman of the California State University, Chico. We talk about the latest book he is working on: 'The Matrix: An exploratory political economy of the dangerous, paradoxical interactions between war, the economy, and economic ideology'. We discuss unintended consequences, the difficult of decision-making in complex situations, US Imperialism, Vietnam, Heavyweight Boxing ,and the little talked about darker side of Winston Churchill. You can check out the Professors books here And here is his blog: http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com/ Enjoy!
Irish Left Review - Déar Meith 26, 2014 15:30
A talk followed by Q&A: Alvaro Sanchez
(Charge d?Affaires, Venezuelan embassy to Ireland and the UK)Introduced by:
Jack O?Connor - General President SIPTUOn: 14th July 2014
At: Liberty Hall, Dublin
Michael Taft - Déar Meith 26, 2014 12:02
Irish living standards are now closer to the bottom of the EU-15 countries than to the top; they are closer to Greece than to Germany or Belgium or the UK or most other EU-15 countries. Eurostat has just released its annual estimates of household living standards. To measure this they use Actual Individual Consumption (AIC). According to Eurostat:
'In national accounts, Household Final Consumption Expenditure (HFCE) denotes expenditure on goods and services that are purchased and paid for by households. Actual Individual Consumption (AIC), on the other hand, consists of goods and services actually consumed by individuals, irrespective of whether these goods and services are purchased and paid for by households, by government, or by non-profit organisations. In international volume comparisons, AIC is often seen as the preferable measure, since it is not influenced by the fact that the organisation of certain important services consumed by households, like health and education services differs a lot across countries. For example, if dental services are paid for by the government in one country, and by households in another, an international comparison based on HFCE would not compare like with like, whereas one based on AIC would. . . Actual Individual Consumption per capita is an alternative indicator better adapted to describe the material welfare of households.'In short, AIC captures goods and services bought by households and by Governments on behalf of households. The following table shows the relationship of European countries' living standards to the EU-15 average, with the EU-15 equalling 100.
Ireland is approximately 11 percent below the average EU-15 living standards. We rank 12th in the league table. What?s noteworthy is that we are closer to Greece than to most other countries. We are 14 indice points above Greece but 15 points below the UK. There are eight other countries above the UK.
Michael Taft - Luan Meith 23, 2014 13:09
Previously, I discussed the assertions that rising housing costs were caused by over-paid construction workers. It wasn?t true but that never stops some commentators from trying to find blame ? and finding it in workers? pay packets. It?s been going on since the start of the crisis. And it still goes on. The Irish Times reported that consumer prices in Ireland are still much higher than in most other EU countries:
?Even after six years of austerity, consumer prices in Ireland are on average 18 per cent higher than the European Union norm, prompting renewed concern about the country?s competitiveness.?Why should this still be the case? Costs associated with being an island on the periphery (transport and import costs?). Oligopolistic price-setting in key sectors? Alan McQuaid, economist with Merrion Stockbrokers, believes he has part of the answer:
?The other key issue which these figures highlight is the underlying cost for retailers - eg rents, insurance and wage costs - are higher than elsewhere. You cannot look to have one of the highest minimum wages in Europe, and then not be surprised that prices are more expensive than the rest of the bloc.?Oh, my, it comes back to those darned over-paid workers, this time in the in the retail sector where workers are undermining our competitiveness by getting an average weekly income of ?512 a week (and this includes management salaries; weekly income for shop floor workers are bound to be much lower). Let?s look at this claim about high wages in the retail sector and see how we compare with other countries, using the National Accounts here and here. We will use the Wholesale / Retail sector (there is little data at the retail sector only) but this sector as a whole would impact on costs for consumers. First up, employee compensation.
Ireland is below the mean average of other EU-15 countries (no data for Sweden) and well-below most other countries. We?re only higher than other peripheral countries and low-paid UK. This shouldn?t be surprising. Unite the Union examined employee compensation using the Eurostat Labour Cost Survey and found pretty much the same picture.
Micheal Flynn - Céad Meith 18, 2014 10:19
The following piece is based on a much longer article ?Scapegoating During a Time of Crisis: A Critique of Post-Celtic Tiger Ireland?, co-written by Micheal Flynn, Lee Monaghan and Martin Power. It is available here.
Austerity and Scapegoating: two sides of the same coin
Class war is in large part a propaganda war; it is in no way confined to formal political life, but works its way through all the institutions of society. For the most part it is the ruling class that is advancing ? most obviously through the commercial media, which so often serves to divide, disempower, demoralise and dis-benefit the working class.
Only a few years ago it was generally accepted that bankers, developers and speculators destroyed Ireland?s economy. In the wake of the collapse, Brian Lenihan?s claim that ?we all partied? was rightly understood as an attempt to deflect blame from those actually responsible. Most understood that it was the recklessness of the investing classes, coupled with the political decision to socialise private bank debt that had forced hundreds of thousands on to dole queues and/or through airport departure gates. For a time, the anger of the population was focused squarely of those that had destroyed the economy.
Yet, notions of collective responsibility have been carefully fostered ever since. The idea of a specifically Irish lust for property (or even a ?property-owning gene?) appears to have become the common-sense of our time. The commercial media, with the help of the trendy economists elevated to celebrity status, such as David McWilliams, reason that everything went askew because of a ?cult of property?. We Irish gave in to a ?mass delusion? - or as Indakinny so eloquently explained ?we all went a bit mad with borrowing?.
Consequently, and very conveniently, the role of developers, speculators and politicians - their systematic destruction of alternatives to crippling mortgage debt, the role of section 23 tax breaks, the endemic planning corruption revealed by the Mahon tribunal, are all put out of sight as blame is socialised. This makes it far easier to justify the on-going socialisation of debt, which in turn helps to rationalise the ?tough decisions? that government insists are unavoidable. The subsequent apportioning of blame to specific targets is likewise done in a manner consistent with the distribution of austerity.
As expected, cuts to the public sector have gone hand-in-hand with attempts to demonize public sector workers. With the public sector now on the chopping block, ?over-paid? and ?under worked? public sector workers have been identified as unbearable burdens on the public finances. Rather than remain focused on where the billions are actually going, attention is paid to a ?privileged? public sector. This cultivation of resentment gives licence to savage cuts and softens the public up for privatisations. Even better, damage done to the highly-unionised public sector also damages the trade union movement, which when weakened makes for more effective attacks on pay and conditions down the line.
Michael Taft - Máirt Meith 17, 2014 12:41
The affluent are blessed in their champions. They have a myriad of commentators fighting their corner. In the Sunday Independent Colm McCarthy, discussing the benefits or otherwise of a third tax rate on high incomes, stated:
?In order to raise meaningful amounts, it (the threshold to enter the third rate of tax) cannot be pitched at a level much higher than the ?100,000 indicated, but that pulls into the high-tax bracket many people who do not consider themselves exceptionally well-off.??100,000 not exceptionally well-off? Ok, maybe, but they certainly are ?well-off?; very well-off. In fact, they are in the top 3 percent of income earners in the state. If these high-earners don?t consider themselves exceptionally well-off, what would they think if they were part of the 50 percent of income taxpayers who earn below ?29,000 a year? Or the 25 percent of the population who live in official deprivation. These kinds of comments are part of the don?t-tax-high-earners-too-much-because-then-they-will-leave-in-a-tax-huff argument. Thomas Molly, writing in the same newspaper, puts it this way when discussing the wealth tax:
?Any other sort of wealth tax is likely to bring in very little money as the cash moves overseas at warp speed but is guaranteed to scare away many of the people who create wealth and jobs in our society.?Ah, tax flight ? the phenomenon whereby high taxation causes people to leave the jurisdiction. How valid is this? Not very. The US is a good place to study. Individual states can set their own income and wealth taxes in addition to Federal taxes. And moving from one state to the next is not nearly as challenging as moving from one EU country to the next. So what happens when states like Maryland or New Jersey or Oregon raised taxes on the highest income groups? This study ? ?Tax Flight is a Myth?? found:
?Attacks on sorely-needed increases in state tax revenues often include the unproven claim that tax hikes will drive large numbers of households ? particularly the most affluent ? to other states. The same claim also is used to justify new tax cuts. Compelling evidence shows that this claim is false. The effects of tax increases on migration are, at most, small ? so small that states that raise income taxes on the most affluent households can be assured of a substantial net gain in revenue.?
Helena Sheehan - Luan Meith 16, 2014 10:04
This article is based on a talk given at conference ?Local Resistance, Global Crisis? at National University of Ireland, Maynooth, 13th of June 2014
Does Ireland need a new left party?
We are involved in a colossal class struggle and we are not winning.
We need to confront the very system that is demanding ever more drastic redistribution of wealth from below to above, accelerated accumulation by dispossession, continuing dismantling of the public sphere in favour of private property and commodified culture.
It is not enough to go issue to issue, to oppose cuts, to denounce austerity.
We need to win consent to a counter-narrative to the dominant view of the crisis. We need to break the grip of the belief that there is no alternative.
We need to fashion a force that will challenge for power that will make the long march through all the institutions of society: schools, universities, media, trade unions, local councils, national and international parliaments, production, distribution and exchange.
We need the best possible left. We need to maximise our efforts.
We need to build on electoral gains by the left in elections of 2011 and 2014. The last general election saw the greatest overturning in Dail Eireann in its history and the next will outdo it, we have every reason to believe. The last elections and recent polls indicate a huge shift, primarily to the left, in Irish politics.
We need to aim to form a left government in the next decade or so.
For this, we need a new left party. A party of a new type. By which I don?t mean a Marxist-Leninist vanguard party. Traditionally parties of the left have been communist, Trotskyist or social democratic parties. This would be different.
We have a multiplicity of left parties of the traditional types, quite a few of them M-L vanguard parties. All of these have maxed out their potential in their present form. Some are still vital, while others have been in decline for some time.
In the first category are the Socialist Workers Party and Socialist Party, each of which have formed broader fronts, the People Before Profit Alliance and Anti-Austerity Alliance. In the second category are the Communist Party of Ireland and Workers Party. The two Trotskyist parties and their broader fronts have been especially active on the streets and in electoral politics and they have achieved considerable success. They also built and broke the United Left Alliance.
None of these formations, in and of themselves, form the basis for the sort of new left party we need. They will be important in the future of any new left formation, but a new left party cannot be ULA 2.0.
We also have two bigger parties of the left, although some may contest whether they are left: the Labour Party and Sinn Fein. They are left, but not as left as what we need. This is primarily because they do not engage in systemic analysis and therefore they do not move in the direction of systemic transformation.
There is a big empty space where a big party to the left of LP and SF should be. We need a new left party to fill this space.
What kind of new left party should this be?