Defence industry dominates EU’s security research programme

The NeoConOpticon report, released today by the Transnational Institute (TNI) and Statewatch,
reveals the extent to which Europe’s largest defence and IT contractors are benefitting from a €1.4
billion EU “security research” programme that has the explicit aim of fostering a European Homeland
Security industry to compete globally with the USA in a fast growing market.

“The whole process appears to have been designed by lobbyists, for lobbyists“, says Ben Hayes, TNI
associate and author of the report. “In its desire to increase ‘industrial competitiveness’, the EU has
effectively outsourced the design of the security research agenda to the some of the corporations that
have the most to gain from its implementation”.

Defence giants including Thales, Finmeccanica, EADS, Saab and Sagem Défénsé Sécurité are
amongst a host of corporations to which the European Commission has turned to help set the agenda
for security research, develop Homeland Security strategies for Europe, and bring the relevant
security technologies ‘to market’. Of 46 security research contracts awarded in the first year of the
EU’s Framework Programme (FP7, the Union’s research programme for 2007-2013), 17 (or 37%) are
led by defence sector contractors.

The report also reveals the extent of Israel’s participation in the EU security research programme,
which is controversial in the light of widespread criticism of Israel's human rights record. Israeli actors
or entities are participating in 10 of the first 46 projects, leading four of them. The Counter Terrorism
Bureau of Israel’s National Security Council, the Israeli Defence Force and the Israeli emergency
services are among the security experts selected to advise the working groups of the European
Security Research and Innovation Forum (ESRIF).

There has been only minimal democratic scrutiny of the programme and very little monitoring of its
implementation. The design of the ESRP has been outsourced through sub-contracting and the
creation of ad hoc EU groups comprised of government officials, security ‘experts’ and companies
selling homeland security products.

“There is, of course, nothing new about governments consulting about policy, particularly at the EU
level, but while corporations have been embraced by the ESRP, parliaments and civil society have
been largely excluded. The process has been wholly undemocratic,” says Hayes.

The ESRP is promoting the development of a range of technologies that could engender systematic
violations of fundamental rights, according to the report. They include militarised border controls,
surveillance and profiling technologies, the widespread collection and analysis of personal data,
automated targeting systems, satellite and space-based surveillance, and ‘crisis management’ tools.
While these high-tech systems can be used for ostensibly positive purposes such as environmental
observation and traffic control, they also represent an unprecedented state intrusion into every sphere
of daily life.

“It is not just a case of “sleepwalking into a surveillance society”, concludes Hayes, “it feels more like
turning a blind eye to the start of a new kind of arms race, one in which all the weapons are pointing
inwards.”

The research examined all 85 of the projects funded under the EU security research programme to the
end of 2008, together with several thousand related EU-funded R&D projects from other thematic
programmes.

Transnational Institute (TNI) +31-20-6626608
Nina Brenjo +31 (0) 63 484 2129 (nina.brenjo@tni.org) or
Ben Hayes +44 (0) 20 8802 1882 (ben@statewatch.org)
Download the NeoConOpticon report here:
http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/neoconopticon-report.pdf and http://www.tni.org/reports
For more information visit: http://www.tni.org or http://www.statewatch.org