 Rheinmetall Plans to Make 700,000 Artill... Thu Apr 25, 2024 04:03 | Anti-Empire
America’s Shell Production Is Leaping,... Wed Apr 24, 2024 05:29 | Anti-Empire
Ukraine Keeps Snapping Up Chinese Drones Tue Apr 23, 2024 03:14 | Anti-Empire
Moscow Is Prosecuting the War on a Pathe... Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:26 | Anti-Empire
US Military Aid to Kiev Passes After Tru... Sun Apr 21, 2024 05:57 | Anti-Empire Anti-Empire >>
A Blog About Human Rights
UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights
5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights
Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights
Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights
Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights Human Rights in Ireland >>
Eastern Europe is Showing Britain Up on Free Speech Thu Apr 25, 2024 09:00 | ?t?pán Hobza
It is now in Prague where freedom of speech is tolerated, and it is in Britain where it is under assault, says ?t?pán Hobza. Sackings and character assassinations have proliferated in the 'cradle of liberalism'.
The post Eastern Europe is Showing Britain Up on Free Speech appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Transgenderism, Social Media ? and Aliens Thu Apr 25, 2024 07:00 | Steven Tucker
Are smartphones turning us all into a new and strange alien species? Not literally, obviously, but Steven Tucker finds symbolic truth in some of the weirder UFO conspiracies.
The post Transgenderism, Social Media ? and Aliens appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Thu Apr 25, 2024 00:31 | Will Jones
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Micromanagement of Speech in the Workplace is Out of Control Wed Apr 24, 2024 19:30 | Dr David McGrogan
Forget hate speech laws, says Dr David McGrogan. Speech in the workplace is already micromanaged in intolerable ways by employment law ? and it's getting worse.
The post The Micromanagement of Speech in the Workplace is Out of Control appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Who Was Responsible for the ?Look Them in the Eyes? Campaign? Wed Apr 24, 2024 17:32 | Dr Gary Sidley
We all remember the harrowing "Look them in the eyes" messaging campaign, aimed at terrifying the populace into compliance with Covid restrictions. Now, Dr. Gary Sidley exposes the people behind it.
The post Who Was Responsible for the “Look Them in the Eyes” Campaign? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Israel's complex relations with Iran, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Apr 24, 2024 05:25 | en
Iran's hypersonic missiles generate deterrence through terror, says Scott Ritter... Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:37 | en
When the West confuses Law and Politics Sat Apr 20, 2024 09:09 | en
The cost of war, by Manlio Dinucci Wed Apr 17, 2024 04:12 | en
Angela Merkel and François Hollande's crime against peace, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Apr 16, 2024 06:58 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Search words: bodenstown
New Labour Sell-out in Kilkenny
 national |
politics / elections |
opinion/analysis
 Wednesday December 03, 2008 20:24 by Nixie Boran - Mine & Quarry Union
Sparks Fly at Gilmore's New Labour Bash!
Why did Eamonn Gilmore’s New Labour pre-Christmas jolly in Kilkenny (Nov 29 – 30) blow up in his face?
Who is the shadowy eminence grise behind Gilmore's Twenty First Century Commission?
Why were the party faithful reduced to discussing leaked extracts from the Twenty First Century Commission report in Kilkenny? Why did the comrades revolt at Gilmore's proposals for a dynamic, modern, internet-driven, Lisbon-friendly, union-free, Obama-style revamp of the creaky old party of Larkin and Connolly?
Gilmore brought the comrades together to schmooze their consent to his Twenty First Century Commission Report. But early soundings indicated that the trade unions would not roll over for him, and that the comrades themselves were not prepared to commit electoral mass suicide on the altar of Lisbon.
So the Twenty First Century Commission Report had to be pulled at the last minute, and, in a surreal development, the Twenty First Century Commission Conference in Kilkenny was limited to discussing various leaked sections of the Report itself. You couldn’t make it up!
The shadowy Peter Mandelson-figure behind Gilmore’s failed New Labour proposals is one Greg Sparks whose day-job is with FGS Tax Consultants Limited, one of the mushroom growths which flourished on the dung of the Tiger.
Their website says: “Greg Sparks has vast experience in consulting and corporate finance, and has unrivalled expertise in public sector projects …advising on the liberalisation of Ireland's electricity industry.” http://www.fgspartnership.com
According to the same website, Sparks’ main claim to fame is his role in setting up and running the North’s Strategic Investment Board, which is the driver for the Private Finance Initiative which enables private financial interests to suck the blood of the North’s schools, hospitals and other public services.
Just what Ireland needs as the world economy falls apart at the hands of the corporate financiers, globalisers and liberalisers!
You would think that Gilmore and his crew might just have noticed that the world has suddenly recognised the necessity of reining in the brain-dead spivs, financiers, globalisers and liberalisers like Sparks, and of putting our livelihoods under some social guardianship!
In view of Fianna Fáil’s financial disaster, all he really had to do to prepare for the next election was to say: “We warned you about this!” (Actually they didn’t.)
A further indicator of New Labour’s incompetence was given in a curious conference sideshow. A proposal to engage politically in Northern Ireland was squashed by the Twenty First Century Commission, on the grounds that contesting elections there would force Labour to declare itself to be either Unionist or Nationalist. Therefore Labour members in the North should join the Fianna Fáil-leaning SDLP – which declares itself to be Nationalist!
A leaflet distributed by the Northern Labour conference delegates pointed this out, in a commendably restrained manner, saying that the Good Friday Agreement requires that parties in the North declare themselves as Unionist, Nationalist – or Other. And that the previous Labour leaders had endorsed the position that Labour in the North was Other.
The Good Friday Agreement received endorsement in the Irish Constitution. New Labour seeks to present itself as fit to govern the country whilst publicly displaying egregious ignorance, not only of its own existing policies, but of the Constitution of the country it seeks to govern!
In a moment reminiscent of the legendary, perhaps mythical, occasion when a group from Belfast’s Shankill Road attending the Wolfe Tone commemoration at bodenstown in the 1930’s were attacked by southern Catholic Republicans, Sparks was struck dumb when one of the Northern delegates asked Sparks how, as a Protestant, he could be instructed to join the SDLP.
At the last sighting, the rebuffed Northerners were hot-footing it across the Boyne towards the fastnesses of North Belfast.
So much for “Hands Across the Border” in Gilmore’s New Labour!
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6" the Irish Labour Party, which still had a small political organisation north of the border, a remnant of its establishment in 1912, instructed all its members to join the new SDLP."
For more of this New Labour treachery, see extract from the Twenty First Century Commission report at:
http://southbelfastdiary.blogspot.com/2008/11/close-doo....html
More analysis of the Northern aspect of the Commission here:
Examiner Letters, Thursday, December 04, 2008
Party leaders’ selective condemnation of terror
LABOUR party leader Eamon Gilmore played the anti-terrorism card in his party leader’s address to the Labour conference last Saturday.
He expressed sympathy with the victims of the Mumbai attacks in which almost 200 people were killed. There is nothing wrong with that in itself, but his remarks came immediately after his attempt to bring the Labour party back in line with his support for the Lisbon Treaty.
What is wrong is that Gilmore and many other politicians consistently ignore far greater examples of terrorism that happen to be state terrorism. Why is it that 200 people in India, or 3,000 people in the USA, appear to be more important than one million people killed in Iraq due to state terrorism by the US and its allies, or 200,000 people killed in the Darfur genocide by the Sudanese government and its allies?
John Gormley, at his Green party convention, adopted a different but equally flawed strategy. He publicly insulted the Chinese ambassador, representing the most populous state in the world, over the issue of Chinese human rights abuses, but pointedly ignored the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the US torture rendition programme, all being facilitated at Shannon airport by the Irish Government of which he is senior minister.
Gormley, Gilmore and most Irish politicians have virtually nothing to say on the greatest tragedy that has occurred since the end of the Cold War, the conflict in the Congo that has claimed up to five million lives so far and is still ongoing.
Being vocally against terrorism perpetrated by small groups and individuals, but being silent on much more serious terrorism perpetrated by states, indicates a western self-interest that takes precedence over genuine humanitarian concerns to the extent that it amounts to an insidious form of racism.
Why is it that Iraqi and Congolese people are not important enough to warrant sympathy?
Edward Horgan
Castletroy
Co Limerick
Labour Conference is Riven by Conflict as Unions Block Change
By Luke Byrne, Irish Mail on Sunday, 30/11/08.
It should have been about unity and a new start but the Labour Party conference was instead plagued by internal disputes yesterday.
Leader Eamon Gilmore wanted to launch a blueprint for party reform modelled on the ‘New Labour’ success of Tony Blair in Britain – but met resistance from powerful hard-line unions.
There was further rebellion at the conference in Hotel Kilkenny yesterday when SIPTU President Jack O’Connor called for Labour to ditch Fine Gael, its 2007 general election partner. Mr O’Connor criticised Fine Gael’s ‘neo-liberal’ policies and, in an impassioned speech, said a vote for Fine Gael would be ‘political suicide’.
It was the fallout from the Lisbon Treaty referendum that provoked the most heated debate. Senior party figures were bombarded with questions and criticism from grassroots members over the party’s support for the treaty.
TD Joe Costello and MEP Proinsias de Rossa faced tough questioning during a discussion on the future of Europe. The small room was so full that at one point Mr Gilmore couldn’t get in.
One member said: ‘It seems inevitable now that the Lisbon referendum will be rerun. It makes me wonder if what Declan Ganley has said about democracy and accountability is true. I voted No and I’m glad to say I voted No.’
Another member said: ‘I do not want a situation where we are sharing foreign policy with ex-imperial states’, which was greeted with shouts of ‘hear, hear’.
Responding to questions about a possible rerun, Mr de Rossa said: ‘That is how democracy works. If every time somebody who ran for a election and lost was unable to do so again, what state would we be in?’
Mr Gilmore delivered the closing speech last night.
He said: ‘The key to getting out of this crisis is not how much the Government can cut but what it can create. That is why Labour alone among all the political parties wants a stimulus plan for the Irish economy. That is what the Labour government is doing in Britain, what the European Commission has called for, what president-elect Obama intends to do in the US. That is what we need to do here.’
Mr Gilmore also hinted that if they got into government, Labour would buy back Eircom.
[END OF MAIL ARTICLE]
Re Mr de Rossa's interpretation of democracy:
So if Lisbon is re-run and scrapes through, what's the betting that de Rossa will be demanding that the issue will be put to a new referendum later on, to see if the electorate still want it? Maybe de Rossa believes that when a candidate gets a seat after initial rejection, that he will never have to face the electorate again, and that he should be allowed to remain in office for the rest of his life?
Pat Rabbitte, Belfast, October 18 2004:
“Today's event is to publicly launch the Northern Ireland Labour Forum. Ten years ago, at the time of the first ceasefires, Dick Spring - the Labour Party leader of the time - located Labour as occupying political ground as a "third strand" of political life, neither Unionist, nor Nationalist.
"It is our fervent hope that the modest beginning we see today in launching the Labour Forum, will grow to occupy the ground of a third strand, the ground of the radical dissenting tradition, the ground of Thomas Russell and those since who have maintained that tradition.”
http://www.labour.ie/northernireland/rspeech.html
Below is a leaflet distributed at the Kilkenny conference:
The 21st Century Commission
NORTHERN IRELAND
The 21st Century Commission’s conclusions about Northern Ireland (Section 8) are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the terms of the Good Friday Agreement.
Contrary to what its report says, the Labour Party would NOT have to designate itself as either Unionist or Nationalist in order to organise and contest elections in Northern Ireland.
Organisation in Northern Ireland doesn’t require designation at all, and neither does contesting Local Government elections. Designation would only become an issue for the Party if it were to contest elections to the Northern Ireland Assembly – since members elected to the Assembly have to designate themselves as either Unionist, Nationalist or Other, before taking their seats. This is a requirement of Clause 6 of Stand One of the Good Friday Agreement, which states:
“At their first meeting, members of the Assembly will register a designation of identity – nationalist, unionist or other – for the purposes of measuring cross-community support in Assembly votes under the relevant provisions above.”
It goes without saying that, if the Party were to stand in Assembly elections, it would opt for the Other designation, as Alliance and Green Party members of the Assembly do at the moment, and which would offer the best chance of the Party making an appeal across the traditional divide.
Unfortunately, the 21st Century Commission doesn’t seem to be aware of the existence of the Other designation. Its report states:
“... we are not at all convinced that parties based in either Dublin or London have any real or significant contribution to make to Northern Ireland politics by organising there – and adopting one or other of those labels for the purpose.
“Effectively, this would require Labour to opt for adherence to – and seek votes exclusively from – just one of the two traditions, …”
Given the existence of the Other designation, that passage is simply untrue. The Good Friday Agreement would NOT “require Labour to opt for adherence to – and seek votes exclusively from – just one of the two traditions”.
Labour Party members in Northern Ireland are drawn from both traditions. We are utterly opposed to the Party seeking votes exclusively from just one of the two traditions and we wouldn’t remain members if it did. Happily, the Good Friday Agreement doesn’t require the Party to do so, if it were to put up candidates in either Local Government or Assembly elections.
STRENGTHENING LINKS WITH THE SDLP
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS “the strengthening of links” between the Labour Party and the SDLP, rather than the Party organising and contesting elections in Northern Ireland in its own right.
Remember, the SDLP has always chosen to designate itself as Nationalist in the Assembly and to opt “for adherence to – and seek votes exclusively from – just one of the two traditions”, in the words of the Commission.
Under the Good Friday Agreement, it has always been open to the SDLP to designate itself as Other, and attempt to appeal across the traditional divide. It has never done so. Were it to do so, it would obviously risk losing a significant section of its vote to Sinn Fein – and it’s therefore unlikely that it will ever do so.
If the Labour Party were to stand for elections in Northern Ireland, it would seek to appeal across the traditional divide. To that end, in Assembly elections the Labour Party would obviously designate itself as Other and, by so doing, avoid giving the appearance of appealing to just one tradition.
ARE WE TO BE INSTRUCTED TO JOIN THE SDLP?
A FINAL POINT: the report poses the question “should the Labour Party follow Fianna Fail and consider organising in the North”.
We find it difficult to believe that the Commission is NOT aware that the Labour Party is already organised in Northern Ireland, and has been since 2004, when Pat Rabbitte launched the Northern Ireland Labour Forum (NILF) in Belfast. We proposed to the Labour Party conference last November that the Party contest Local Government elections in Northern Ireland. In response, the NEC set up “a special commission, representative of the NILF, the PLP and the NEC” to explore the issue, amongst others. Two Party members from Northern Ireland sit on the special commission, which has yet to report.
The 21st Century Commission has now apparently usurped the role of the special commission and concluded, on the basis of an imperfect knowledge of the Good Friday Agreement, that the Party should have no organisation in Northern Ireland, as the Party did in 1970 at the time of the SDLP’s foundation. It follows logically from this that the existing organisation of the Party in Northern Ireland should be disbanded.
In 1970, as the Commission’s report reminds us, the Party “instructed all its members to join the new SDLP”. Is that the Commission’s recommendation in 2008? Are we going to be told to join a party which, in the words of the Commission, has chosen to opt “for adherence to – and seek votes exclusively from – just one of the two traditions”.