â€˜Reduced Serviceâ€™ Sat Jun 18, 2022 11:37 | Anti-Empire
Inconvenient Questions for the â€œSpecia... Wed Jun 15, 2022 16:32 | Anti-Empire
Who Dares Apply Anti-Interventionist Ana... Tue Jun 14, 2022 11:15 | Anti-Empire
Kiev Puts Its Military Deaths at 10,000 ... Mon Jun 13, 2022 05:58 | Anti-Empire
Rosgvard Wasnâ€™t Told Theyâ€™d Be Going... Sun Jun 12, 2022 14:24 | Rolo Slavsky
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Putin: Address to participants of 10th St Petersburg International Legal Forum Thu Jun 30, 2022 12:24 | amarynth
Address to participants of 10th St Petersburg International Legal Forum Vladimir Putin gave a video address to greet the participants of a plenary session of the 10th St Petersburg International Legal Forum. This year?s plenary session was themed Law
Sergey Lavrov: Roundtable discussion SCO Treaties Thu Jun 30, 2022 12:07 | amarynth
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov?s video address to the organisers of and participants in the roundtable discussion dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the SCO Charter and the 15th anniversary of
Paradoxically, the Soviet Union, the ultimate symbol of communism, was created by international bank... Thu Jun 30, 2022 11:01 | amarynth
By Guilherme Wilbert for the Saker Blog One of the great post-World War II myths, which is repeated like a mantra by starched college students with a syndrome of embracing
Douglas MacGregor: Its collapsed Wed Jun 29, 2022 23:51 | amarynth
Michael Hudson interviewed by Ben Norton (Multipolarista) Wed Jun 29, 2022 11:59 | amarynth
Economist Michael Hudson on inflation and Fed plan to cut wages: A depression is coming
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTE bias complaint
Fergus Finlay and the maternity hospital ‘gotcha’ trap Anthony
Irish Examiner and fake news Anthony
Labour Party: The unvarnished truth Anthony
Humanity: Zero chance of survival Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Voltaire, international edition
Ecstasy lab seized on Kleine-Brogel NATO base Thu Jun 30, 2022 07:33 | en
Discordance among Israeli officials over Iran Thu Jun 30, 2022 07:10 | en
Soldiers sent by Western countries fighting in Ukraine Wed Jun 29, 2022 18:16 | en
The scuttling of peace in Europe, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Jun 29, 2022 17:29 | en
Russia threatens Western decision-making centers Wed Jun 29, 2022 06:36 | en
Voltaire Network >>
Search words: tara
An Informed And Reasoned Piece On Why To Vote A Big No To Lisbon
politics / elections |
Wednesday June 11, 2008 14:31 by Raymond Bhreatnach - NUJ
AN INFORMED AND REASONED PIECE ON WHY TO VOTE A BIG NO TO LISBON
AN INFORMED AND REASONED PIECE ON WHY TO VOTE A BIG NO TO LISBON
Europe is most definitely a great thing for all of the European nations. But we need to reject this Treaty and go back to the drawing board. A Treaty which incorporates social justice and policy needs to be drawn up. A Treaty which suits big businesses and the superpowers of Europe needs to be rejected.
A message needs to be sent out once and for all, that we are not going to be bullied into voting for a Treaty again and again until it is accepted. This Treaty was roundly defeated before, and it should not be subject to a referendum.
The silence of an informed political debate from the 'Yes' campaign is deafening. Former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern’s reasoned debate is to call all the 'No' campaign 'lula's'. An intellectual and rounded opinion don’t you think. We are used to seeing this rhetoric from dictators and bureaucrats.
Go my way or the highway. Scaremongering tactics with no political nous. Reminiscent of a teenage slanging match of who can say the harshest comment.
This Treaty has already been defeated twice in the Netherlands and France, and this is basically the same Treaty with the wording slightly changed. All the major parties in France were campaigning for a 'Yes' vote. So it is not necessarily the case that a 'Yes' vote is a given.
The wording of the Treaty is left open to interpretation. Nothing is set in stone and the Treaty is vulnerable in its concept and easy to manipulate. The 'Yes' campaign maintains the Treaty strengthens the role of national parliament. The European Union will only take action if it is more effective than local level. Who dictates this? The European Union. And what are the choices for local authorities if the EU decides to implement the policy anyway?
If we are to go by the record of the present incumbents in the Irish government, we will have little or no say on local issues. Their corruption on land regulations and planning permission issues over the years is well chronicled. They now want us to take the local decision making out of the hands of the local authorities, and put it into the hands of people who do not even know the first thing about a particular area. Be it Dublin 12, Drumshambo in Leitrim, or wherever it may be in any constituency in the European Union.
The ‘Yes’ vote maintain the Treaty will allow greater scope for business enterprises, and further business opportunities for companies in Ireland. This is a half truth. Instead of encouraging small businesses, the greater scope for larger companies will allow further monopolisation of the markets for corporate companies.
These companies are already earning billions. But feel the need to monopolise the market in order to stamp out any competition whatsoever. Thus making the market more beneficial to multinational companies and even more detrimental to smaller companies. These small/medium companies are more in need of help and financial assistance.
One of the favourite scaremongering tactics bandied around by the ‘Yes’ campaign is, Ireland will lose out on business if we vote no to the Treaty. This is a complete falsehood as the the EU will continue to operate under its present rules if the Treaty is defeated. And there is no indication whatsoever of existing or prospective companies pulling out, if we were to vote no on the Treaty.
The Treaty claims to prioritise energy and climate change. Again what does this mean? There are absolutely no details of how they will do this. The biggest and most challenging issue for the whole world over the next 50 years is climate change. And all we get from the Treaty speaking on behalf of all the members of Europe is a token gesture making it a priority. A meagre 6 words have been added to the existing recommendation. No policy, no initiatives and no sense. There is absolutely no indication of when these policies will be implemented and how.
Protocol 12 of the Treaty refers to EURATOM (European Atomic Energy Commission). This commission’s fundamental priority is to promote nuclear energy. So the pro–Treaty factions are proposing a European State which promotes more Chernobyl’s and Sellafield’s. Measured and practical approaches to resolving climate and environmental issue’s don’t you think?!
The so called party for the environment in Ireland has completely sold themselves out in this regard. Voting ‘Yes’ due to their involvement in government, the Green Party must answer to their electorate in the next election.
This has come on top of their complete u-turn on the Ringsend incinerator and their silence over the new motorway going through tara Hill, on the Navan Road. One has to ask what is their function in government? A meaningless car emissions policy so far has been their policy output.
The Treaty reduces the power and influence of the smaller states (i.e. Ireland), and gives further voting rights to the ‘big boys’. And choices will be made in the name of economics and finance, rather than social and people needs.
Under the present criteria the major European powers (France, Germany, Italy, and UK) have 29 votes each. Ireland under present policy has 7 votes, as one of the smaller countries.
A qualified majority at present requires 74% of the vote. If the Treaty is ratified, from 2014, the following applies; only 55% of the member states must agree. 15 of the 27 member states must agree. This clearly gives even more power to the European superpowers. Particularly considering the voting power the larger nations secure under the Treaty.
The new ruling would copper fasten the superpowers hold on Europe. The developing and less powerful countries will have an even lesser say in how Europe is governed.
The Treaty intends to increase military power in Europe. Article 28c includes the following; ‘member states shall undertake to improve their military capabilities.’ Financial contributions to the EU for military purposes are also increased. This also further erodes Irish neutrality as we put more and more military initiatives into the hands of the EU.
The charter of fundamental rights in the Treaty refers to civil rights, equality and freedom for all European members. The rights for European members will remain the same regardless of a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ vote.
The government will always maintain we live in a wealthy and thriving nation for all. The reality is the majority of the nation is in debt. A nation where two incomes are needed to support a family. Crèches are highly overpriced, the health system is on its knees, and the price of living is at an all time high.
There is gross overpricing of consumer goods, and petrol prices are at an all time high. A society where the needy and people who really need assistance are randomly ignored. The question is do you trust this Government and it's cohorts to implement a Treaty which is fair to all Irish citizens?
A 'Yes' vote will ensure a continuation of the privatisation system implemented by the government. This will continue the taking away of our civil rights towards our state bodies, such as Aer Lingus and our health system (co-location, VHI, triple taxation health system). And continue the ever increasing trend towards a full capitalist society where all that matters is money. A society where people are a mere cog in the machine. Existing simply to provide the people with money with more of the same.
The Labour Party are pursuing a ‘Yes’ vote for the Treaty. This party was initially established to encourage and support equal rights, and to campaign for people's rights at the bottom of the ladder. It’s becoming fundamentally clear that the labour party are selling their principles into the ground for greater reward. Especially since taking up liaisons with Fine Gael.
Like their cohorts in Northern Ireland, The SDLP, and the UK Labour party, they are bowing to middle of the road conservatism. A form of politics which has never worked for the majority of Irish citizens and never will.
James Connolly, described by Eamonn Gilmore (Labour leader), as ‘the towering figure in the history of the Irish Labour movement’, must be turning in his grave at Labour's sell out stance on the Treaty.
It’s becoming increasingly apparent that while Sinn Fein and the Workers Party continue to campaign for equal rights, the labour party are moving further and further away from their reason to be.
It has become clear that the EU is suppressing information from the electorate. Committees in the EU Parliament have been officially advised by the Head of the Constitution Affairs committee not to debate politically sensitive issues relating to the Lisbon Treaty, until after the referendum in Ireland.
To date there has been a lot of bluster from the yes side but little real information about the Treaty. The government has yet to set out in concrete terms why they believe the Lisbon Treaty is a good thing for Ireland.
There has been absolutely no attempt by the cohorts of the Lisbon Treaty to have an open debate. No clarity and a lack of understanding, which has left most voters not even knowing the importance of what they are voting on. We will have no say in future implementation of policy, as we are basically signing over our fundamental rights to the European commission.
It allows Europe and the Treaty to dictate Irish law and regulations (Trade, Economy, security, planning regulations) without input and consultation. Many regulations and legislation will be introduced which will not necessarily be in the interests of Irish policy and heritage. Money and greed will be the dominating policies, over the greater good and the upkeep of our traditions. Cultural and heritage decisions like the tara Hill debacle will become the norm.
The Nice Treaty was defeated in 2001. They continually bring back the same policies to a referendum until they are successful. Even a wooden spoon team wins some times! This would be considered a form of autocracy in other independent sovereign nations.
The Irish electorate and Treaty voters really have to ask themselves the question; do they want more of the same regarding privatisation of hospitals, healthcare and all public sectors? Or do they wish for a more egalitarian system, which will allow for an equal system regardless of background?
The question posed regarding the road for EU and Irish health policies raises another more pertinent issue. Has any of these members of parliament who propose the treaty and implement the rules, actually ever had a family member, close friend who has been sat on a waiting list, or hospital trolley?
Do they have any idea whatsoever what the ordinary citizens of Ireland have to contend with, when it comes to a third class health system? I very much think not.
The acceptances of the Treaty will rubberstamp these failed health policies, and give them the leeway to do more of the same.
A perfect example of the government’s money hungry policies is the new report by FAS, indicating a potential freefall in the construction industry. A situation which has already begun.
This bad industrial climate could have been avoided with the implementation of careful planning. Ignoring the wishes of hungry property developers, and taking into account the needs of Irish citizens.
Proper organisation should have been adhered to in the surrounding areas where the developments are being built. In terms of proper traffic procedures, and adequate facilities for all constituent’s.
This government – particularly Fianna Fail and The PD’s – have a track record of distorting the truth and misleading the Irish public. On all the important issues, health, development planning and market prices, quality of living, and prices in every aspect of Irish business.
The Lisbon Treaty will only enhance their ability to further use their financial and political clout. For their own political purpose. The knock on effect would be a further decrease in democracy. Resulting in an evermore widening gap between the rich and the poor, leaving the way open for further bureaucracy from the bureaucrats.
The facts of the matter are there will be no repercussions for Ireland within Europe if it is a ‘No’ vote. This is just an attempt to scare the electorate into a ‘Yes’ vote. Any job losses or economic downturn will be a natural occurrence. A ‘No’ vote is not a vote against Europe, but merely a message being sent to our politicians to go back and draw up a proper and more appropriate Treaty. A Treaty which exists for the whole of Europe. Not just for the privileged and prosperous. Do yourselves a favour and send out the message that we will not be dictated to any more.