Antrim no events posted in last week
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Newcastle United Fan Who Was Banned From Matches Over ?Gender Critical? Tweets Prepares to Sue the F... Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:02 | Richard Eldred Banned by Newcastle United for her 'gender-critical' tweets, Linzi Smith is suing the FA, criticising their LGBTQ+ rainbow campaign as an unlawful attempt to impose political propaganda on players.
The post Newcastle United Fan Who Was Banned From Matches Over ?Gender Critical? Tweets Prepares to Sue the FA Over ?Unlawful? Rainbow Armband Campaign appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Massive Cover-up Launched by U.K. Met Office to Hide its 103 Non-Existent Temperature Measuring Stat... Mon Dec 09, 2024 09:00 | Chris Morrison Chris Morrison, the Daily Sceptic's Environment Editor, is astonished by the Met Office's attempt to conceal the fact that many of its 'climate stations' still regularly reporting temperatures closed long ago.
The post Massive Cover-up Launched by U.K. Met Office to Hide its 103 Non-Existent Temperature Measuring Stations appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is it a Crime to Tell the Truth? If You Live in Britain, and That Truth Will Damage ?Community Relat... Mon Dec 09, 2024 07:00 | Laurie Wastell Laurie Wastell asks whether Derek Heggie deserves to be imprisoned for saying something undeniably true about Muslim grooming gangs.
The post Is it a Crime to Tell the Truth? If You Live in Britain, and That Truth Will Damage ?Community Relations?, the Answer Seems to be Yes appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Mon Dec 09, 2024 01:24 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Suella Braverman?s Husband to Join Reform Sun Dec 08, 2024 19:00 | Richard Eldred Suella Braverman's husband has joined Reform, sparking whispers that the former Home Secretary might be eyeing Nigel Farage's camp next.
The post Suella Braverman?s Husband to Join Reform appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?111 Fri Dec 06, 2024 12:25 | en
Attempted coup d'?tat in South Korea Fri Dec 06, 2024 12:17 | en
What is changing in the Middle East , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 03, 2024 07:08 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?110 Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:01 | en
Verbal ceasefire in Lebanon Fri Nov 29, 2024 14:52 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
If the brit government really took the terrorists threats seriously..
antrim |
miscellaneous |
opinion/analysis
Saturday July 09, 2005 00:26 by hacked off in hackney

If the brit government really believed and took al-ciaeda threats seriously.
Knowing the fact that they were dealing with rich ruthless disassociated cold blooded killers (trained by our own ruthless dissociated psychopaths at CIA black ops in Afghanistan in the 1980's, programmed and trained to kill and maim Russian soldiers mercilessly).
The security services should have put in place, body frisking and bag searching check points at the entrance of London tubes and on entering buses a long time ago. Al-ciaeda are not like republicans and other guerilla groups who ALWAYS phone in prior warnings of bombs, and give the authorities time to evacuate buildings etc.
Why are the british government so complacent and so matter of fact about mass civillian casualities and fatalities?
If no warning bombs were going off in Belfast, body frisking and bag searching would still be in place at security barriers at city centre entrances and at the entrances of shops.
It's time they introduced routine body frisking and bag searching in London, it doesn't cost much money and there's no need to use expensive equipment, it also doesn't infringe on civil liberties or human rights. We had body frisking and bag searching in Belfast for 20 years, which was carried out by private security firms, there was very little aggro.
Given the so called intelligence about the nature and danger of al-ciaeda terrorists, why were the majority of the Met/MI5/MI6 pulled out of London, and relocated to Gleneagles to protect 8 rich people, leaving 3 million ordinary people in London unprotected.
Afterall whats 700 injured londoners and upwards of 50 ordinary people dead, compared to the safety of 8 of the richest people on the planet.
Are Londoners expected to swallow Tony's comforting words hook,line and sinker, and just sit back and hope for the best?
Is relying on just hoping to not to get caught up in a no warning bomb on the ungerground/buses, effective security and protection?
The brit government doesn't have to spend millions on intricate, complex intelligence survailence etc, all it has to do is put in place body frisking and bag searches at entrances to the tubes.
Is it mass stupidity for Londoners to settle for Tony's stiff upper lip bollocks and his 'we won't change our way of life' or in other words, we don't want to spend any more money on simple basic security measures.
The british government can spend millions of tax payers money on war in Iraq, yet it won't implement basic, simple security measures for its own people.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)