A bird's eye view of the vineyard
How Russia Implements the Minsk 2 Agreement, by Scott Humor Mon Feb 20, 2017 05:03 | Scott
A few years ago, I was having coffee with my then-business partner. He happened to be in the middle of a process called “enrolling your child in a private school.”
Moveable Feast Cafe 2017/02/19 ? Open Thread Sun Feb 19, 2017 23:00 | Herb Swanson
2017/02/19 23:00:03Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
National Anthems ? a comparison Sun Feb 19, 2017 20:51 | The Saker
by Christine Marais Although involved in many wars, there is no indication that Greece, Persia, Rome or the Ottoman Empire ever had or needed national anthems. When we look at
Trump dreams vs Trump reality ? hopes still permitted! Sun Feb 19, 2017 05:09 | The Saker
This article was written for the Unz Review: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/trump-dream... For a lot of Trump supporters the past week has been a painful one. Whether we chose to react with abject
Iran and Hezbollah respond to Donald Trump Sat Feb 18, 2017 21:59 | The Saker
by Sayed Hasan Since his election campaign, Donald Trump has not hidden his fierce hostility to the international deal on Iran’s nuclear program, calling it the worst of the agreements
The Saker >>
Hague Justice Journal: Call for Papers Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:13 | GuestPost
Reflections on the Citizen?s Assembly (3): The Presentation of Dr. Joan McCarthy Tue Feb 14, 2017 14:01 | GuestPost
Reflections on the Citizens Assembly (2): The Presentation of Bobbie Farsides Tue Feb 07, 2017 05:44 | GuestPost
Languishing in Direct Provision: Rights in ?Reasonable? and ?Unreasonable? Times Mon Feb 06, 2017 18:10 | Liam Thornton
The Story of King Tex: A Modern Allegory Fri Feb 03, 2017 06:20 | GuestPost
Human Rights in Ireland >>
For lefties too stubborn to quit
is it me or are ?leadership? contests in parties like FG generally very very dull. 20:01 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Policing stories 14:47 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Poll projections? 12:45 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Left Archive: RSYM Position on Recent Developments (IRSP) ? c.2009 02:21 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | leftarchivist
The Fine Gael leadership race? Who much cares? 13:00 Sun Feb 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Cedar Lounge >>
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting
Notes for a Book on Money and the Irish State - The Marshall Aid Program 15:10 Sat Apr 02, 2016
The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015
Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015
THE WRATH OF KANE: BANKING CRISES AND POLITICAL POWER 09:32 Fri Jan 30, 2015
ALWAYS THE ARTISTS: WEEK THREE OF THE BANK INQUIRY 23:11 Thu Jan 22, 2015
Dublin Opinion >>
Reaction to Court win for Kilkenny farmers plagued by foxhunters
Saturday February 09, 2013 14:34 by Farmers Against Hunting and Trespass
Increasing numbers of farmers banning hunts from their lands
Farmers against Fox Hunting and Trespass (FAFT) welcomes the outcome of the defamation case brought by two County Kilkenny farmers against a senior hunt official.
On February 4th, Hubert and Norman Daniels were awarded in excess of 30,000 Euro against Mr. Edward Norris of the Kilkenny Hunt in Kilkenny Circuit.
Farmers at Kilkenny Circuit Court after winning defamation case against hunt supremo
Aside from the defamation issue, we note that Norman and Hubert Daniels, the farmers concerned, had been videotaping hunt activity for years in an attempt to deter incursion by hunts on their land.
FAFT would make the point that many other farmers around the country have similar concerns, and indeed have had extremely negative experiences involving foxhunts. Extensive damage is caused every year by hunts trespassing on land and wreaking havoc in their pursuit of foxes. We believe that foxhunting is the scourge of modern agriculture.
Farming is a business and a farmer’s land is his “workshop”. The arrival onto his land of scores of horses, hounds and hunt followers to cause mayhem and destruction is the exact equivalent of having a gang of vandals break into a factory and running riot...breaking machines and furniture, and frightening the living daylights out of the workers. Such an incursion would not be tolerated, yet farmers nationwide have to contend with the ever present threat of hunt invasion and vandalism.
Farmers have to observe certain rules of good farming practise. There are books to be kept and records of animals with correct dates, numbers, and tags. Every farmer is required not to spread slurry at certain times of year. He cannot leave land exposed in winter- fallow or poached. He has to keep his hedges stock proof. He has to avail of the latest electric fencing and numerous other expensive modern aids to prevent animals from straying onto roads that are busier now than at any time in history.
These requirements are enshrined in law, and any breach on the farmer’s part can result in severe penalties, including withdrawal or drastic reduction of monetary payments, impacting drastically on his income and livelihood, or, in extreme cases, forcing him out of farming altogether.
This is the background to the plight of the two farmers who found themselves in court in the defamation suit against the Kilkenny Hunt official. Their refusal to allow hunts on their lands has to be seen in the light of those factors. Like other farmers, they have to keep their fences stock proof, their animals safe; their land in proper condition to give early grass, and they must have sufficient winter fodder, to keep their animals well fed and bedded for winter.
How can hunts be allowed then to undermine or even destroy attempts by farmers to meet all these requirements and to comply with the various EU and IFA rules?
IFA rules state that hunts must seek permission before passing over their lands and cannot encroach on any property without such permission. In practise, however, hunts routinely flout these rules, damaging fences, tearing up fields of valuable crops, traumatising livestock and scattering herds of sheep and cattle in all directions. When challenged by farmers about this rural vandalism, the hunters haughtily laugh off the protests and look down their noses at the victimised landowners as if nothing had happened. FAFT sees this behaviour not just in terms of trespass and damage caused: We also regard it as a form of bullying. We assert the right of all farmers to stand up to the foxhunts, to the clear and present danger they pose to the interests and incomes of those who struggle to make a living off the land.
We have enough challenges facing us without the hunt “cavalry” visiting mayhem on our lives and legitimate enterprises. We urge Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney to include a total ban on foxhunting in the Animal Health and Welfare Bill that is currently proceeding through the Oireachtas. Drag hunting could replace it, enabling an artificial scent to be laid so as to avoid farmland and all lands declared off limits to hunting.
(Re photo: The Daniels Brothers of Tullaroan, County Kilkenny have been awarded 30 K against foxhunt official in Kilkenny Circuit Court. Justice at last after seven year nightmare ordeal!
Left to Right: Hubert Daniels, Tullaroan, County Kilkenny, Peter McDonald, Mullinavat, County Kilkenny, (a farmer who has fought a long battle against hunts in his area), Norman Daniels, and Philip Lynch, Mallardstown, Callan, County Kilkenny (Chairman of Farmers Against Foxhunting and former longtime County IFA official)
Philip P Lynch
Chairman, Farmers against Foxhunting and Trespass
Tel: 056-77 25 309
Mobile: 086 088 9579
Mallardstown, Callan, Co. Kilkenny
Foxhunting...cruel to foxes and farmers!